“And the woman whom you saw means the great city that has a kingdom over the kings of the earth.” — Revelation 17:18
Like a river, Time flows swiftly, and not always in the same direction. In a river, sometimes an eddy can form and cause a current to swirl repeatedly, in a loop that can’t be broken except by an external force. Time can be said to flow like this too: not always one-directional and often looping as history repeats itself. Or, as one speaker said, “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme.”
For the discussion of this blog, we would like to pluck out two rhyming moments from this River of Time. These are two moments that have looped back on each other in the same moment of Space and Time: Boston, Massachusetts of April 19, 2013 and Boston, Massachusetts of April 19, 1775. What follows in this blog is based on the premise that a meme of revolution is now being hyped in the current moment just as it was in the older moment. And the same entity that promoted the 1775 meme is the same entity that promotes it now.
The “Woman” mentioned in the Biblical tag line above is this entity. She is also described as the Great Harlot, with a name, Babylon the Great. This Harlot exercises control over the “kings of the earth.” She has been in existence for over 4,000 years. So obviously, she pre-dates the Roman Catholic Church. Throughout history she has changed her public mask many times. We use the term “Vatican” in this blog as a convenient public face for this harlot. However, this harlot encompasses a network that is much larger, and older, than just one church. As will be seen in this blog, the elite strata of this religious empire has indeed exercised a rulership “over the kings of the earth.” There have also been numerous times in history when the elite strata of this church have actually been at odds with their own church. This indicates that, while this powerful cabal needs some sort of physical institution from which to work, like the Vatican, it actually works under an allegiance to a much wider, and older, network.
This blog also acknowledges the fact that there are billions of practicing Catholics on this earth who may be unaware of the relationship of their Church to the Harlot. And there are likewise many thousands of priests, even Jesuit priests, of worthy character who go about their ministry unaware of the machinations going on behind the scenes. It is the hope of this blog that any reader of any religious persuasion will consider the evidence here, do one’s own extra research, and take steps toward gaining the real freedom and liberty that your Creator has in store for all nations, tribes, peoples, and tongues.
The moment in April 2013 of which we speak is of course the Boston Marathon Bombing Incident that took place on April 15, 2013 and the carefully staged events that unfurled throughout the rest of that week. In the state of Massachusetts, the third Monday of April is a state holiday known as Patriot’s Day. This is a day meant to call to mind the events in Boston that sparked the first American Revolution, namely the “Ride of Paul Revere” and the battle of Lexington and Concord. That battle took place on April 19, 1775.
It is the opinion of this blogger that the events that played out after the Boston Bomb event did indeed call to mind the events of the First American Revolution. That terrible incident may have been carefully orchestrated as a prelude to what may well turn out to be the Second American Revolution. In support of that idea, the reader is here encouraged to consider the many analyses posted on the Internet that show that many aspects of the event were clearly staged. Just search the word “Boston” in the Search Box of that web page for more discussion.
But what this blogger feels is one key point when looking at the week-long Boston Bomb aftermath is, not so much the idea that the event was staged, but what was the effect produced from the staging? This question is raised in keeping with the olde Hegelian dialectic, a common denominator of all false flag operations: Problem –> Reaction –> Solution.
We see two opposing energies resulting from this Boston Bomb incident, two opposite, polarizing results. One energy is felt by the Majority of the audience, and the other is felt by a Minority of the audience.
The intended result felt by the Majority began to be disseminated on the night of April 19, 2013 when government storm-troopers invaded the homes of Watertown, Massachusetts in search of the Boston suspects. Highly dramatic images of security teams attired in vests and helmets and guns were broadcast across the world. The residents freely welcomed these warrantless teams into their homes. The police action was accompanied with cheers of approval from the bystanders. Even the emotions of the television audience were led along to root for the manhunters.
The imagery was quite impressive. This article on Wikipedia states:
A 20-block area of Watertown was cordoned off and residents were told not to leave their homes or answer the door as officers in tactical gear scoured the area. Helicopters circled the area and SWAT teams in armored vehicles moved through in formation, with officers going door-to-door. On the scene were the FBI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Department of Homeland Security, the National Guard, the Boston and Watertown Police departments and the Massachusetts State Police. The show of force was the first major field test of the interagency task forces created in the wake of the September 11 attacks.
Hail to Caesar for keeping the citizens safe! The energy wave felt by a Majority of people on this date was one of relief and acceptance of the Police State.
But there was also an opposing energy being picked up by a Minority of people. This was the energy of Distrust and Conspiracy. A wave that moves through a Minority of people is still worthy of note because statistics tell us that a revolution can be sparked by less than 20% of the total population. This article on effecting change within a school says: “Consensus and majority favor are not necessary to initiate change. The number of people who must be convinced of a new concept or approach is approximately 15 to 20% of a school’s population.”
At 5:20 PM, April 18th, this meme was born during the FBI press conference that launched the manhunt for the suspects. During that press conference, the public was told to “not look at any other photos but ours.” The Director of the FBI then presented a poster board to which was affixed a photo image of the suspect, an image that was later easily shown to have been digitally edited.
That statement made by the FBI was laughably ridiculous. For one thing, millions of people had already seen other photos and hundreds of eyewitness bystanders already carried their own photos and videos because, well, nowadays everybody carries smart phones. But the statement was so extreme that it must have been deliberately planted to produce a desired emotional response. It was almost as if the FBI was waving a red flag, yelling: “Look! Look here at the illusion that is being presented to you on a silver platter!”
The avalanche of public videos and photos that presented themselves even while that press conference was in progress strongly show that the FBI or Special Ops forces had been tailing the Tsarnaev men that very day in Boston. One video clearly showed a security agent speaking into his ear piece as one of the Tsarnaev men walked right past him on the Boston sidewalk. Media reports began to fill the airwaves about how Russian intelligence services had long been updating the FBI of the activities of these men. In fact, these men had been under surveillance by the FBI for many years.
With these facts in hand, the public was led to see that the April 18th FBI press conference was a sham. For all we know, those public photos and FBI timelines were themselves planted into the media by the Magician himself. “Somebody” needed to make sure that a Minority of the population would take hold of that meme of Distrust. Within hours, it most certainly did.
Following the press conference, a rapid succession of events followed throughout the week, Patriot’s Week. And just as rapidly as this intelligence operation was coming to a conclusion, the derailment of public confidence in the FBI began to grow. It continues to grow like a mould, right down to the date of this posting, with the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder, under suspicion of numerous crimes. All of this is a carefully orchestrated trail of events designed to elicit a mood of anti-government distrust and the ensuing mood of revolution from a sector of the American public.
However, we must keep in mind that both memes are just two polarized ends of the one force, a force being manipulated like a puppet from the one Master Puppeteer. To identify the Puppeteer let us now consider the parallel moment in Space and Time from Boston of April 1775. If you look carefully at the original trail of events in Boston of 1775, you may see a similar orchestration of events that elicited a similar response of revolt from the American generation of that era.
THE GREEN DRAGON TAVERN OF 1775 BOSTON
Almost overnight, a religious empire that had been hated and shunned by New Englanders for a hundred years was practically welcomed into town with open arms. Let us take a look at those events that preceded the First American Revolutionary War. See if you find a pattern emerging in this eddy in the River of Time. One point that is often overlooked is the influence that two holiday observances had on the people of Boston as they were led along a path towards Revolution.
Nowadays, when people think of the cultural make-up of Boston, they often associate the city with Irish Catholic heritage. But this was not the case during the 16th and early 17th centuries. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia itself, “those who were [Catholic] had few inducements to settle in the Puritan colony where their Faith was held in detestation.” Citations from various reference works follow below. The phrases shown below in bold represent emphasis added by this blogger.
During the war with France one hundred French Catholics were arrested in Boston in 1746 “to prevent any danger the town may be in” but the sheriff much to the disgust of their captors refused to hold them. In 1756 the exiled Acadians of whom nearly 2000 had landed in Massachusetts were denied the services of a priest because, as Governor Hutchinson declared, “the people would upon no terms have consented to the public exercise of religious worship by Roman Catholic priests.”
The Boston “Town Records” (1772, pp. 95-96) while admitting that toleration in religion was what all good and candid minds in all ages have ever practiced” excluded “Roman Catholicks” because their belief was “subversive of society”.
Therefore we see that the sentiment among New Englanders was a strong loathing for Roman Catholicism. Another sentiment prevalent among New Englanders was a general reluctance to rebel against the British crown. Contrary to the picture presented in most American history textbooks, the people of the American colonies were very averse to cruising down a road of revolution. Note the words of this reference:
“With the possible (and doubtful) exception of Samuel Adams,” Rakove writes, “none of these who took leading roles in the struggle actively set out to foment rebellion or found a republic. They became revolutionaries despite themselves.”
In his newest book, he argues that the American Revolution may never have happened without the miscalculations of the British governor of Massachusetts, Thomas Hutchinson. Those miscalculations sparked the Boston Tea Party, which in turn galvanized a disparate collection of colonial leaders.
In fact, 20% of the American population remained loyal to the British crown during the entire war. Some statistics indicate that as much as half the population of New York remained Loyalist. Even Benjamin Franklin’s son, William, remained a Loyalist and moved to Canada!
This reference notes: http://countrystudies.us/united-states/history-33.htm
Americans today think of the War for Independence as a revolution, but in important respects it was also a civil war. American Loyalists, or “Tories” as their opponents called them, opposed the Revolution, and many took up arms against the rebels. Estimates of the number of Loyalists range as high as 500,000, or 20 percent of the white population of the colonies.
What motivated the Loyalists? Most educated Americans, whether Loyalist or Revolutionary, accepted John Locke’s theory of natural rights and limited government. Thus, the Loyalists, like the rebels, criticized such British actions as the Stamp Act and the Coercive Acts. Loyalists wanted to pursue peaceful forms of protest because they believed that violence would give rise to mob rule or tyranny. They also believed that independence would mean the loss of economic benefits derived from membership in the British mercantile system.
Loyalists came from all walks of life. The majority were small farmers, artisans and shopkeepers. Not surprisingly, most British officials remained loyal to the Crown. Wealthy merchants tended to remain loyal, as did Anglican ministers, especially in Puritan New England. Loyalists also included some blacks (to whom the British promised freedom), Indians, indentured servants and some German immigrants, who supported the Crown mainly because George III was of German origin.
The number of Loyalists in each colony varied. Recent estimates suggest that half the population of New York was Loyalist; it had an aristocratic culture and was occupied throughout the Revolution by the British. In the Carolinas, back-country farmers were Loyalist, whereas the Tidewater planters tended to support the Revolution.
… About 100,000 Loyalists left the country, including William Franklin, the son of Benjamin, and John Singleton Copley, the greatest American painter of the period. Most settled in Canada. Some eventually returned, although several state governments excluded the Loyalists from holding public office. In the decades after the Revolution, Americans preferred to forget about the Loyalists. Apart from Copley, the Loyalists became nonpersons in American history.
To summarize, what we have in the months preceding the Boston Tea Party is a Boston population with strong loyal sentiment to the British crown, a reluctance to spark revolt, a detestation of Roman Catholicism that was nevertheless accompanied with, as shall be seen in the paragraphs below, a curious affinity for observing two particular Jesuit Catholic holidays.
We turn again to the history published by the Catholic Encyclopedia:
With the Revolution, however, came the dawn of a better era, the upsetting of religious as well as political barriers, and the beginning of the slow but sure growth of the Church which has resulted in the wonderful change of the present. A favorite New England diversion was an annual procession, on 5 November, of the Pope and the Devil in celebration of the famous “Gunpowder Plot”.
In Boston it was usually attended by riot and violence. In 1775 [George] Washington, while at Boston, issued an order in which he could not “help expressing his surprise that there should be officers and soldiers in this army so void of Common sense” as to thus insult the religious feelings of the Canadians with whom friendship and an alliance was then being sought.
Now isn’t that interesting. What was it that turned the tide of anti-Catholic sentiment in Boston?
For this answer, let us enter the dining hall of the Green Dragon Tavern. For it was in this pub that men like Paul Revere and Samuel Adams made plans to oust the British red coats from New England. And it just so happens that the Green Dragon Tavern was owned by … drum roll please … the St. Andrews Lodge of Freemasons. And not just any Freemasons but Scottish Rite Freemasons. In fact, the Tavern had just been purchased a few years previously on March 31, 1764. We know this because the archives of the Boston Freemasons record a commemoration in 1864 to mark the centennial of that purchase. This 1864 centennial was a really, really big deal – and the purchase of the Green Dragon Tavern by these Jesuit-leaning Freemasons in 1764 was viewed by them likewise as a very big deal.
We would encourage the reader to do his own research outside of this blog to learn the historical connections of the rise of the Scottish Rite Freemasons to the dispersion of the Knights Templar on Friday the 13th of the year 1307. The purging of the Knights Templar was another act of “suppression” likewise effected by a Pope and French Royals just as the “suppression” of the Jesuit Order would later be enacted by another Pope and another set of French Royals on July 21, 1773.
The Scottish “Antient,” or, Ancient, Freemasons of the 16th and 17th centuries were unusually sympathetic with the Catholic Church, or more specifically, to the elite strata within the Church as personified by different groups all through history, like the Knights Templar and the Jesuit Order. It is no secret of history that powerful Catholic Scots had long been trying to regain control of the British throne. The tyrannical British monarch was seen as a monarch worthy of assassination. This explains how it is that the “Gunpowder Plot” of Guy Fawkes Day came to be celebrated with such gusto in Boston, as noted above in the excerpt from the Catholic Encyclopedia.
Please note that the Gunpowder Plot was at one time also known as the “Jesuit Treason.“ See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunpowder_plot
And just as it is today, the image of the Guy Fawkes mask has come to be synonymous with justified revolution. The “Gunpowder Plot” had been a scheme hatched by a Jesuit priest in England. So, regardless of the anti-Catholic sentiment felt by most New Englanders at the dawn of the 1700s, by the time the King of England was clamping down with his iron boot in Boston, suddenly the imagery of a revolutionary Jesuit priest took on positive overtones for Americans who “just couldn’t take it anymore.” The reader is here encouraged to do one’s own research outside of this blog regarding the subjugation of all the royal families of Europe to the Pope (see “Donation of Constantine”). It was this subjugation that effected the oppression of the Colonists in the first place. The readers of this blog may already see a redundant theme in these pages: that the Puppet Master is controlling both sides of the chess board.
Once you consider that the activities of the 1775 Boston Freemason lodge are playing out at the exact time in history when the Jesuit Order is in disfavor with the Pope, deductive reasoning would suggest a specific agenda on the part of the Jesuits who have now become persona non grata with the Pope. They were looking for two things: 1) a new western base, and 2) a means of exacting vengeance on the disobedient sovereign powers of Europe and the Pope who had interrupted their flow of power in Europe.
Having been kicked out of Europe, they were still free to operate in the lands of Catherine the Great of Russia because she simply ignored the Papal order. This will become important farther down in this blog when we discuss the success of the Continental Army at Valley Forge. And since all the new wealth was in the Americas, the Jesuits needed to set up shop there. But how to do that when New Englanders hated Catholics?
To their rescue came the St. Andrews Freemasons, the closest thing to a Catholic church that you could find in Boston at that time. This is a very logical shelter for the Jesuits since it had been the Scottish Rite Freemasons who protected the fleeing Knights Templar 400 years earlier. Why, these Boston Freemasons even observed the Feast Day of St. John the Baptist and St. John the Evangelist at the time of the summer solstice. This is an unusually Catholic festival whose observance by the usually anti-Catholic Bostonians was equally unusual. And if one takes the customarily held view that the Catholic Church is opposed to Freemasonry, then the observance of this very Catholic festival within Freemason lodges is even more confusing. However, once you consider that the Jesuit Order of the 18th century was well connected to the rise of Adam Weishaupt’s Illuminati and that the elite of this order were steeped in pagan rituals, suddenly this observance within the Boston Freemason community is not so confusing after all.
Regarding the importance of this Catholic observance to the Boston Freemasons of the 1700’s, their own official archive states these facts:
On the 24th of June, 1772, the festival of St. John the Baptist, was celebrated by the Massachusetts Grand Lodge, by a public procession, formed at Concert Hall, the brethren marching in full regalia to Christ Church in Salem street, where “a very suitable and pertinent discourse was preached by the Rev. Samuel Fayerweather, of Narragansett”; after which they returned to Masons’ Hall, and “dined together in the Garden, under a long Tent erected for that purpose; and the remainder of the day was dedicated to mirth and social festivity.”
Public Masonic Processions were at this time of rare occurrence. One of the earliest of which we have any record, took place on St. John’s Day, Dec. 27, 1749, and was the occasion of unusual curiosity and interest in the community.
… that the principal leaders of the Revolution in Boston, were members of the Masonic Fraternity, and many of them of the Lodge which held its communications there, – a circumstance which would very naturally influence them in the selection of the place for their private consultations. It is not however, to be inferred from this, that they either met as Masons or used Masonry as a cover to their purposes; for others than Masons were associated with them.
The deep significance of this Holy Day of the two Saint Johns is shown in this reference by a writer who is himself a Freemason:
The Saint’s Johns appear to Freemasons in several places in our catechisms. Their proximity and use in our rituals have been questioned for many years as to their use and placement. Looked at together, saint John the Baptist and St. John the Evangelist serve to represent the balance in Masonry between zeal for the fraternity and learned equilibrium. The Saints John, stand in perfect parallel harmony representing that balance.
From a historical approach, The Saint John’s festival is said to be a widely celebrated Masonic holiday. Traditionally June 24th (or the summer Solstice) is taken to be John the Baptist’s day, which is celebrated in many cultures around the world. According to McCoy’s Masonic Dictionary, the Festival of St. John in summer is a duty of every Mason to participate in, and should serve to be a renewal and strengthening of fraternal ties and a celebration of Masonry from “olden-times”. It functions as a connection between the past and the future.
The festival, to non-Masons, has been called the “Setting of the Watch”, where ceremonial bonfires were lit after sunset. Tradition says that men, women, and children would jump through the fires for luck. Across Europe, this holiday is celebrated in many ways. With oak wreath crowns, wild flowers and birch branches. Families would feast and celebrate in union. The meanings of these ancient traditions are lost today on our society, but the link was made at some point to John the Baptist. The On-line Catholic Encyclopedia points to the birth of John the Baptist as 6 months before Christ, placing him on the summer solstice. It is thought that these festivals have been linked in character and content with the birth of John the Baptist.
From the Masonic perspective we are given the balanced dualism of John the Baptist on one side and John the Evangelist on the other. Represented together this way represent the balance of passionate zeal with and learned knowledge of faith forming a space to reflect on to and channel our passion as well as our education/knowledge. Individually strong, together they stand as a harnessed focus of zeal and knowledge. This counterpoint is not just necessary to Freemasonry but can be applied to all areas of life. Taken as an abstract compilation of symbols, together they represent a well-balanced path towards enlightenment.
To summarize, we have here in Boston, during the week of April 15th 1775 an environment where the Bostonians have been nearly checkmated by an oppressive British government coupled with a few years’ worth of Jesuit inspired emotionalism that teaches the Bostonians to regard violent uprising as the justified spark that will lead them to the enlightenment of an 18th century New World Order. The meme was planted and watered well during those months when the Patriots planned their revolution under the roof of the Jesuit Freemason Green Dragon Tavern.
But the Jesuits were not finished yet with the setup of their New American World Order.
FRIEDRICH VON STEUBEN AND HENRY KNOX
So, if you were the Black Pope of the Jesuit Order and needed to gain control of these new American resources and desired to bring the British Empire to its knees so that you can reclaim your control of Eurasia’s resources, how would you do it? You would use the same device that has worked for thousands of years: set those two factions against each other in war.
And to help insure that George Washington’s Patriots would win the war, the Jesuits came to the rescue again with the arrival of Friedrich von Steuben.
Baron Friedrich von Steuben was born in Prussia in 1730. Steuben was educated at Jesuit schools in Neisse and Breslav and then became an officer in the Prussia military. Steuben served the Prussian king with great ability. He came to the attention of Benjamin Franklin who then persuaded George Washington to bring him to America. Steuben reported to Washington at Valley Forge on February 23, 1778. It is this general who is largely credited with whipping Washington’s soldiers into shape. The success of the Continental Army would not have been possible without the oversight of the Jesuit-trained General von Steuben.
He served as inspector general and Major General of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War. He is credited with being one of the fathers of the Continental Army in teaching them the essentials of military drills, tactics, and disciplines. He wrote the Revolutionary War Drill Manual, the book that served as the standard United States drill manual until the War of 1812. He served as General George Washington’s chief of staff in the final years of the war.
General von Steuben and Major General Henry Knox later went on to found one of the oldest military societies of the United States: the “Order of the Cincinnati”.
Henry Knox is a figure worthy to note in this tale of the Jesuit-inspired Revolutionary War. It seems apparent that he had a close connection to the Patriots like Paul Revere who were holding meetings at the Green Dragon Tavern. Knox was married to a woman with close family ties to British officers. The “Boston 1775” blog noted below favors the idea that it was actually Henry Knox who advised Paul Revere that the Patriot plans had been discovered, he himself being tipped off by information gathered from his wife. This information in turned touched off the Ride of Paul Revere and the ensuing Battle of Lexington and Concord.
For history on the relationship between Paul Revere and Henry Knox, see:
Who Tipped Off Paul Revere?
That page also notes that “Knox had a remarkable rise in the Continental Army after leaving Boston. Drake says he volunteered his services to Gen. Artemas Ward on the day of the Battle of Bunker Hill and, though not involved in that fighting, ‘was actively engaged in reconnoitering service.’” He was appointed as the nation’s first Secretary of War.
Henry Knox and General von Steuben did attend the Freemason meetings at the “Temple of Virtue” in New York in 1783 wherein the plans for the Society of the Cincinnati were laid. The two men worked together in this organization. General von Steuben died about ten years later in 1794.
And while the history books in elementary schools across the United States just love to glorify the patriotism of the Founding Fathers, they always seem to miss the Hidden Hand that was moving the Blue Coats and the Red Coats into battle. And that’s not to say that the quest for independence and liberty did not have merit. Mankind was created with a desire for happiness by his Creator and indeed did exist in an environment that nurtured freedom and creativity in the Garden of Eden. It was only when a false illusion of “alternate freedom” was planted in the mind of the woman Eve that mankind was led down a path of misery. How ironic that this same tactic of “planting the illusion of freedom” was used by the Jesuit-infiltrated Freemasons to launch the American Revolutionary War. Those noble motives in the heart of the Founding Fathers were just putty in the hands of the diabolical Jesuit Order. The Jesuits have an uncanny way of taking something pure and good and manipulating it to their advantage.
To summarize our narrative, here we are sitting back in Boston on April 19, 1775. Moved like chess pieces into a situation that they can no longer tolerate, the early Patriots devise their scheme of revolution in a venue giddy with Jesuit influence. For the illusion to proceed, the necessary events began to domino. The British army makes plans to confiscate the guns of the patriots and they prepare to enter the city at a certain point. For the rebellion to move forward, their intent must necessarily be betrayed, and so the plan is made known to Paul Revere and the other patriots. Oddly, one person in the intimate group of patriots, Dr. Benjamin Church, later comes to be known as a traitor. And yet, tonight of all nights, he does not betray the patriots by doubling back and letting the Red Coats discern that their plans are known. And why doesn’t he do that? Could it be that the Revolt must proceed in order for the illusion to progress? Couple that with the earlier statement in this blog that “the American Revolution may never have happened without the miscalculations of the British governor of Massachusetts, Thomas Hutchinson.” One wonders if he truly was guilty of “miscalculations” because now, in hindsight, the play of events seems quite deliberate and well planned.
And so it goes that the Revolution does move forward, an inevitable conclusion to a tyranny long perpetrated by a Vatican-dominated British sovereignty. But one tyranny was only swapped for another tyranny. This is the tyranny that Mayer Amschel Rothschild described during this same period of history by the words, “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.”
As the Revolutionary War proceeded, the greatest evil that can ever befall a people did in fact befall those American patriots: the collapse of their economy.
“NOT WORTH A CONTINENTAL”
Once the Revolutionary War was sparked, the people of this New World Order were doomed to a continuous cycle of booms and busts, all carefully designed to lead the new nation to the point where it sits today, under the yoke of mathematically unpayable national debt and the Fascist takeover of freedoms and liberties once held so dear.
A few points of history that show how the economy of the Patriots collapsed immediately upon embarking on the Jesuit-inspired revolution are shown below. Remember too as noted above in this blog that one of the reasons why a significant sector of the American population was reluctant to enter the war was this very same looming prospect of economic collapse.
Congress used four main methods to cover the cost of the war, which cost about 66 million dollars in specie (gold and silver). Congress made two issues of paper money, in 1775–1780, and in 1780–81. The first issue amounted to 242 million dollars. This paper money would supposedly be redeemed for state taxes, but the holders were eventually paid off in 1791 at the rate of one cent on the dollar. By 1780, the paper money was “not worth a Continental”, as people said, and a second issue of new currency was attempted. The second issue quickly became nearly worthless—but it was redeemed by the new federal government in 1791 at 100 cents on the dollar. At the same time the states, especially Virginia and the Carolinas, issued over 200 million dollars of their own currency. In effect, the paper money was a hidden tax on the people, and indeed was the only method of taxation that was possible at the time. The skyrocketing inflation was a hardship on the few people who had fixed incomes—but 90 percent of the people were farmers, and were not directly affected by that inflation. Debtors benefited by paying off their debts with depreciated paper. The greatest burden was borne by the soldiers of the Continental Army, whose wages—usually in arrears—declined in value every month, weakening their morale and adding to the hardships suffered by their families.
Starting in 1776, the Congress sought to raise money by loans from wealthy individuals, promising to redeem the bonds after the war. The bonds were in fact redeemed in 1791 at face value, but the scheme raised little money because Americans had little specie, and many of the rich merchants were supporters of the Crown. Starting in 1776, the French secretly supplied the Americans with money, gunpowder and munitions in order to weaken its arch enemy, Great Britain. When France officially entered the war in 1778, the subsidies continued, and the French government, as well as bankers in Paris and Amsterdam loaned large sums to the American war effort. These loans were repaid in full in the 1790s.
Beginning in 1777, Congress repeatedly asked the states to provide money. But the states had no system of taxation either, and were little help. By 1780 Congress was making requisitions for specific supplies of corn, beef, pork and other necessities—an inefficient system that kept the army barely alive….
At this point the reader is encouraged to do one’s own research outside of this blog on the cascade of events that would follow:
- The war of 1812 that led to the creation of the “Second Bank of the United States,” a forerunner of the Federal Reserve central banking system.
- The failure of said Bank during President Andrew Jackson’s time that only caused the Jesuit forces to then re-group.
- The Civil War and the assassination of Abraham Lincoln as ordered by Pope Pius IX and the adoption of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution thus creating the Vatican inspired concept of “Federal” aka “Feudal” control of a nation.
- The rise of the “men who built America” during the Industrial Age and the arrival of Bank of England Rothschild agents like John Pierpont Morgan, a necessary precursor to the mechanization of the coming world wars.
- The ultimate takeover of this country by Jesuit-backed Bankster powers in 1913 when the Federal Reserve Act was passed.
- The Vatican Puppet Master leads the entire globe along along a path of never-ending war, using the Anglo-American financial and military power as its primary chess piece. (See previous blog about the Holocaust)
- The discarding of the Anglo-American power and petro-dollar-dominance as the Puppet Master once again swings in its polarity to the East. The BRICS Empire rises in Asia and the next New World Order is waiting in the wings: a global government, a global money power, a global control of energy resources, a global religion, a global food system, a global health system …, in other words, total global domination.
And it is for the purpose of accomplishing this last point in the above list that this blogger feels the Boston Marathon Bombing incident transpired during the week of April 15, 2013. Much like the original Boston “shot heard round the world,” this new Boston shot may prove to be the catalyst that moves the nation down a path of a Second American Revolution. Only two months have passed since this incident happened and already the world has seen the current administration’s Department of Justice falling publicly from grace as it descends into an abyss of corruption. At the same time, calls for the impeachment of the President are growing louder as the treasonous acts committed by high-ranking members of the State Department in the Benghazi affair are coming into focus. It is probably no coincidence that this shift in public opinion is happening, as, once again, the Puppet Master stirs the cauldron of public mood for revolution and restoration of the rule of law in the United Sates. It all seems very noble and necessary, just as the first Revolutionary War was deemed noble and necessary.
However, as with the First Revolution, this is just another link in a game being played by a global Puppet Master whose only motive is to create the next global empire and finds it necessary to destroy the current empire first.
It is the same pattern of history that has been followed by this same Puppet Master since the days of Nimrod 4,000 years ago. Nimrod was the first New World Order dictator who led a population to clamor for the return of the civilization that they had so enjoyed prior to the flood of Noah’s Day. He did this by instituting a new idea to mankind: worship of a god through the control of temples and priesthoods. The temples and priesthoods also became aligned with the Money Masters and together these factions work as one cabal to exercise control over mankind and earth’s resources. The Biblical account of Nimrod’s escapades in Genesis chapter 10 even makes mention of the fact that there was a colloquial saying in their culture about Nimrod:
He displayed himself a mighty hunter in opposition to Jehovah. That is why there is a saying: “Just like Nim′rod a mighty hunter in opposition to Jehovah.” — Genesis 10:9
Nimrod went on to found the cities of the land of Shinar, including the city of Babel. The “hunting” described in that verse is a reference to his hunting and domination of other men. This city of Babel declined and yet rose again by the name it is more customarily known, Babylon. Even during the time that Jesus Christ walked the earth, an all-pervasive influence from Babylon the Great was still flowing, exercising control over one empire after another: first, Persia, then Greece, then Rome, then the Anglo-American empire.
In Part Two of this blog we shall take a look at the efforts being made today by this Puppet Master to revitalize the sovereignty of its ancient empire in our modern world as it strives to cultivate the next New World Order.